Skip to content
HolonomiX
Products/HX-Provenance
Deployed · Live on marketplace

HX-Provenance

Verifiable inference. Exact recall, cryptographically and numerically.

A hosted Cloud API for fast onramp; a sealed Private Appliance for regulated, sovereign, and air-gapped environments. One verification standard.

StatusLive · Google Cloud + AWS Marketplace
SurfacesCloud API · Private Appliance
SigningML-DSA-65 — FIPS 204
VerificationOffline, from the file alone
Trial30-day marketplace credit
Compute Sign Receipt Bundle Verify offline

In plain language

Most AI systems can show you what they produced. They cannot prove it.

They cannot prove the output came from the model the user thinks it came from. They cannot prove the output was not altered after it was produced. They cannot prove that running the same input through the same model again would produce the same output. And they cannot prove any of this in a way that survives without trust in the company that hosted the computation.

For a lot of AI use cases, none of that matters. A customer-service chatbot does not need to be reproducible. A marketing image does not need an evidence chain. For other use cases, it is the whole game.

A pharma company

using AI to support a clinical decision needs to prove, years later, what the model said and that nothing changed in between.

A bank

using AI to deny a loan needs to prove the model output was the actual output, not a reconstructed approximation, when the regulator comes asking.

A defense program

using AI in mission-critical decision support needs to prove the system that produced an output is the same system that was certified, with the same numeric path, on the same input.

A legal team

in discovery needs to prove what an AI system actually returned, in a form that holds up in court.

There is no good answer to any of these questions today. The audit-trail products on the market record that something happened; they do not prove what the something was. The notarization services time-stamp data; they say nothing about whether the data is the actual model output. The cryptographic signing tools sign whatever you give them; they cannot tell you that the thing you gave them is the real computation.

HX-Provenance is the product that proves it. It does this by combining three things that have not been combined before in a single product surface: cryptographic content binding so the output cannot be altered without detection, post-quantum signatures that will still be valid after the cryptographic standards transition the federal government has mandated by 2031 and the commercial market by 2035, and bit-exact reproducible computation so the same input always produces the same output on conforming hardware.

What gets shipped to the customer is a small piece of evidence attached to every output. That piece of evidence can be verified later, by anyone, without trusting HolonomiX, without calling back to a server, and without depending on any specific cloud provider. The customer can hand that evidence to a regulator, an auditor, a counterparty, or a court, and the verification works.

What you can prove

What was produced?

A signed artifact receipt records the artifact identity and proof context.

Did it change?

Integrity verification detects alteration of signed artifacts or receipt material.

Who or what signed it?

Signer attribution links the receipt to the expected appliance or issuer policy.

Can another party review it?

Evidence bundles package proof for audit, legal, compliance, or external review.

Can verification happen later?

Offline verification supports review without relying on a live vendor dashboard.

Can this stay inside our environment?

The appliance runs inside the customer-controlled environment. Keys, receipts, and evidence storage stay with the customer.

Two selling surfaces

Cloud is the fastest way to start using verifiable inference. Appliance is the only way some buyers can use it at all.

They share the same engineering substrate, the same evidence schema, and the same verification standard. They are sold to different buyers with different operational constraints.

Cloud

HX-Provenance Cloud

Hosted API. For teams that want to start using verifiable inference today.

Shape Hosted API
Endpoint api.holonomx.com
Verification verify.holonomx.com plus offline verifier
Key custody HolonomiX-managed signing keys per environment
Deployment time Minutes, at API key issuance
Buyer Developers, platform teams, AI ops, fast-onramp enterprise
Licensing Tiered subscription: Developer, Team, Business, Enterprise
Now available on Google Cloud Marketplace and AWS Marketplace. Free trial included.
Private Appliance

HX-Provenance Private Appliance

AMI and on-prem deployment. For buyers whose keys cannot leave their control.

Shape Sealed AMI or on-prem appliance
Endpoint Customer-controlled domain or IP
Verification Local verification, offline verifier, no call-home
Key custody Customer-controlled signing keys
Deployment time Hours to days, at appliance install
Buyer Regulated, defense, air-gapped, sovereign-data, customer-key mandate
Licensing Annual license per appliance plus support
Compliance posture Customer-controlled deployment. Supports FedRAMP, IL5, air-gap, and sovereign-cloud postures. Contact access@holonomx.com.

A customer who starts on the Cloud and grows into a procurement that mandates customer-controlled keys can graduate to the Appliance without changing receipt schemas, verification logic, or integration code.

Verification independence

Verification must not require trust in HolonomiX, in the issuing infrastructure, or in any specific cloud provider.

Three independent verification paths ship with the product.

API verification

The Cloud verifier accepts a receipt and returns a deterministic verdict. Used for fast in-product verification.

Public-page verification

verify.holonomx.com accepts pasted receipts, uploaded files, or receipt IDs. No authentication required. Used by recipients who have no customer relationship with HolonomiX.

Offline verification

A local verifier library and CLI ship with both surfaces. Receipt plus issuer public key plus, optionally, the original artifact produces a deterministic verdict offline. No network access. No HolonomiX dependency at verification time.

Offline verification is the path that survives a HolonomiX outage, an issuer change, or a multi-decade evidence-retention requirement.

The evidence bundle

Evidence bundles are portable, signed, offline-verifiable archives that package one or more receipts with all metadata required for independent verification.

evidence-bundle/
  receipt.json              Canonical receipt(s)
  artifact_manifest.json    Hashes of referenced artifacts
  verification_result.json  Issuer-side verification record
  public_key.json           Issuer public key for offline verify
  signature_metadata.json   Algorithm IDs, key fingerprints
  timestamp_metadata.json   Issued-at and clock-source metadata
  workspace_metadata.json   Tenant and environment scope
  bundle.sig                Bundle-level ML-DSA-65 signature

Bundles are exportable as ZIP, tar.zst, or a directory tree. The bundle-level signature binds all contents together; tampering with any component invalidates the bundle. An auditor with the bundle and the issuer public key can verify the entire chain offline.

Evidence portability across the two surfaces is structural, not a roadmap item. A receipt issued by HX-Provenance Cloud verifies under the Private Appliance verifier without modification, and the reverse holds. The exact-receipt schema used by HX-SDP for inference output verification is verifiable under both HX-Provenance verifiers, which is the cross-product integration path.

Technical substrate

The substrate underneath both surfaces, for engineers, security reviewers, and procurement reviewers who need to verify the claims above.

Receipt schema

Receipts are emitted under canonical schema hx.provenance.receipt/v1.1. The schema is stable, fixture-tested, and backward-compatible with hx.exact.receipt/v1.1 for HX-SDP exact-recall verification.

{
  "schema": "hx.provenance.receipt/v1.1",
  "receipt_id": "...",
  "tenant_id": "...",
  "artifact_id": "...",
  "artifact_hash": "sha256:...",
  "issued_at": "ISO-8601 UTC",
  "signer_key_id": "...",
  "signer_public_fingerprint": "sha256:...",
  "signature_algorithm": "ML-DSA-65",
  "signature": "...",
  "verification_metadata": { ... }
}

Receipts are deterministically serialized, with canonical JSON, sorted keys, and stable separators, so the artifact hash and signature are reproducible across implementations. Future-version receipts produced by newer servers are explicitly rejected by older verifiers with a structured error rather than silent acceptance.

Cryptographic primitives

NIST-finalized post-quantum primitives throughout.

Digital signature ML-DSA-65 FIPS 204

Receipt signing and verification

Key encapsulation ML-KEM-768 FIPS 203

Key wrapping, where applicable

Symmetric cipher AES-256-GCM FIPS 197 / SP 800-38D

Authenticated encryption of evidence bundles

Hash SHA-256, SHA-512 FIPS 180-4

Content binding, signer fingerprinting

Random generation HMAC_DRBG SP 800-90A Rev 1

Randomness inside the module boundary

Key derivation HKDF-SHA-256 SP 800-56C Rev 2

Derived keys

Module structure

The cryptographic module is built to FIPS 140-3 architecture, addressing the eleven security requirement areas defined by ISO/IEC 19790. Cryptographic services are available only in the OPERATIONAL state. Errors transition the module to ERROR. Zeroize is terminal.

POWER_ON SELF_TEST OPERATIONAL ERROR ZEROIZED
Power-on self-tests

Known Answer Tests at module initialization for every approved algorithm, with vectors from NIST CAVP and the NIST PQC project. The module refuses to enter OPERATIONAL if any test fails.

Sensitive security parameter management

Secret keys are stored under controlled permissions, accessed through a key-provider abstraction, and zeroized on shutdown using platform secure-memory primitives.

Defined module boundary

The logical boundary is defined in code. Every cryptographic operation in the product flows through the module; no out-of-boundary cryptography is permitted in production deployments.

On certification

CAVP algorithm validation and CMVP module validation are on the enterprise roadmap, gated by buyer commitment. The module is built to the standard. Customers with a procurement requirement for validated modules can engage on the validation path as part of an enterprise contract.

What the Cloud surface exposes

A small, deliberately constrained API.

POST /v1/provenance/receipt          Issue a receipt for an artifact
POST /v1/provenance/verify           Verify a receipt; deterministic verdict
POST /v1/provenance/exact            HX-SDP exact-receipt compatibility path
GET  /v1/provenance/receipt/{id}     Retrieve a previously issued receipt
GET  /v1/provenance/public-key       Issuer public key for offline verification
GET  /v1/provenance/workspaces/{id}/usage   Workspace usage and quota

Delivery and control

The Private Appliance ships as a sealed deployment bundle across multiple delivery shapes. The signed runtime payload is the same in every shape; the differences are packaging.

AWS Marketplace AMI

AWS-resident customers requiring dedicated tenancy or VPC isolation rather than shared cloud

VMware OVA

Enterprise on-prem with vSphere or ESXi

KVM, Proxmox, OpenStack QCOW2

Linux virtualization, private cloud, and OpenStack-based federal clouds

OCI Runtime Kit for Kubernetes

Containerized enterprise deployments and air-gapped Kubernetes clusters

What the customer controls

Signing keys

Generated on the appliance at first boot. Stored on the appliance under customer-controlled permissions. They never leave the customer environment.

Receipt persistence

Receipts and evidence bundles persist in the customer storage backend: local, customer-managed object storage, or customer database.

Verification path

Local verifier and offline verifier ship inside the appliance. No call-home. No required HolonomiX endpoint.

License

Annual per-appliance license as a signed JWT with customer ID, tier, expiry, and feature scope. Install, verification, and rotation work without network access.

Manifest verification

Every shipped file is hashed and the manifest is signed with an offline release key. The appliance verifies its own manifest at first boot and refuses to start if verification fails.

Validation harness

A release-blocking validation script runs fourteen gates covering DNS and TLS posture, health, authentication boundary, public verification, receipt issue and verify, tamper rejection, schema compatibility, bundle export, workspace quota, rate limiting, persistence, backup status, and metrics. The customer security team can run it independently.

Release dossier

Each release ships with a CycloneDX SBOM, vulnerability scan report, build provenance, validation summary, signed release attestation, and offline verification instructions.

// Private Appliance reference architecture
HX-Provenance Private Appliance on Google Cloud: the entire product runs inside the end-customer GCP tenant. A customer-managed VPC accepts HTTPS 443 ingress only; an nginx front end terminates TLS and proxies to the hx-provenance FastAPI service doing ML-DSA-65 signing and verification on persistent disks, with optional customer-owned cloud storage and logging.

Proof points

Hardware-verified execution

The cryptographic substrate underneath HX-Provenance was first demonstrated end to end on real post-quantum hardware on December 3, 2025: ML-DSA-65 signature generation and verification of quantum-circuit execution results from a Rigetti Ankaa-3 superconducting QPU, 84 qubits, running on AWS Braket in us-west-1. The full chain ran through: circuit submitted, results returned, results signed under ML-DSA-65, signature verified by an independent verifier, evidence bundle exported and re-verified offline.

Patent posture

Four named methods are filed as Patent Pending under the underlying provenance package.

  1. Post-quantum cryptographic signing of computational job provenance.
  2. CRYSTALS-Dilithium-3, that is NIST FIPS 204 ML-DSA-65, signature integration with execution-unit results.
  3. Tamper-evident evidence chain construction for verifiable computations.
  4. Multi-backend provenance attestation across heterogeneous execution environments.

Engineering substrate

The product is built on a 25,000-line internal substrate in Python and Rust that has been the subject of formal verification work in Rust, with Verus proofs on the safety-critical core, FIPS 140-3 architectural alignment across the eleven security areas, and continuous internal validation against NIST CAVP test vectors. The substrate has been hardened over five months of internal use.

What HX-Provenance is not

Boundary clarity matters. The product is deliberately scoped, and the following claims are explicitly not made.

Not a blockchain replacement

HX-Provenance does not require, integrate with, or compete against blockchain infrastructure. It is post-quantum cryptographic evidence, not a distributed consensus system.

Not a legal notarization service

Receipts are cryptographic evidence of artifact integrity. Legal weight in any specific jurisdiction is a separate determination requiring counsel review, and is the customer responsibility.

Not a universal compliance guarantee

The product produces evidence aligned with NIST FIPS standards and the CNSA 2.0 transition timeline. Specific regulatory compliance requires the customer deployment, operational practices, and audit posture in addition to the cryptographic substrate.

Not a customer-data custody service

On the Cloud surface, HolonomiX persists receipts and evidence bundles per workspace plan. In the Private Appliance, customer data never leaves the customer environment. Responsibility for primary data lives with the customer in both cases.

Not dependent on HX-SDP

HX-Provenance is a standalone product, separable from the HX-SDP data plane. It does not require GPU infrastructure and it does not require any HolonomiX inference platform. It can be integrated with any system that produces artifacts requiring durable proof.

Engagement path

Cloud onramp

Three steps from sign-up to first verified receipt: create an account, receive an API key, integrate one of three flows. A developer can complete the path in under fifteen minutes. SDKs ship for Python and TypeScript; the CLI ships for Bash and PowerShell environments.

Appliance procurement

Five stages: qualification call covering workload, deployment environment, and key-custody constraints; NDA if needed; hardware and environment confirmation; appliance delivery and assisted deployment; validation report and commercial conversion.

Pilot model

For buyers evaluating both surfaces: a thirty-day Cloud subscription to validate integration and receipt-handling workflow, followed by an Appliance pilot for the production deployment. Receipts issued during the Cloud pilot remain valid and verifiable under the Appliance once it ships, so no re-issuance is required.